Exercise performance and recovery is the main area connected here, and any felt benefit should be read together with the human evidence base.
Some human supplement-context evidence is present and directly informs the score.
Representative tier calculated from paper evidence that passed the collection audit.
The representative ingredient tier is calculated from these target-level evidence groups.
Potential benefit studied in Exercise performance and recovery.
This score reflects the strength of this benefit group. The ingredient tier also considers paper count, repetition, population, and study context.
Potential benefit studied in Fatigue and energy.
This score reflects the strength of this benefit group. The ingredient tier also considers paper count, repetition, population, and study context.
These findings come from stress response, cortisol, anxiety, or sleep outcomes. They may mix felt benefits with physiological markers.
This score reflects the strength of this benefit group. The ingredient tier also considers paper count, repetition, population, and study context.
Potential benefit studied in Cognition and focus.
This score reflects the strength of this benefit group. The ingredient tier also considers paper count, repetition, population, and study context.
This range includes studies in specific patient groups. It is not a general dose or recommendation.
Findings from studies of this ingredient alone are separated from findings involving another supplement or medication.
Side effects reported for the ingredient alone are separated from findings involving another supplement or medication.
Symptoms or adverse events reported in studies of this ingredient without another active ingredient.
These studies reported a negative change, reduced absorption, or another caution when substances were used together. They do not predict an individual outcome.
Positive combination findings are separated by how the study compared the groups. This is not a recommendation to combine them.
The combination had a positive result, but the contribution of each ingredient could not be separated.
Paper IDs and full lists are private. Only study types and summaries are shown.
[Abstract]: The objective was to investigate the stimulating and normalizing effect of the adaptogen Rhodiola rosea extract SHR-5 in foreign students during a stressful examination period. The study was performed as a double-blind, randomized and placebo-contr
[Abstract]: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of standardized extract SHR-5 of rhizomes of Rhodiola rosea L. in patients suffering from a current episode of mild/moderate depression. The phase III clinical trial was carried out
[Abstract]: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of the standardised extract SHR-5 of roots of Rhodiola Rosea L. in the treatment of individuals suffering from stress-related fatigue. The phase III clinical trial took the form of a randomised, doubl
[Abstract]: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical study with an extra non-treatment group was performed to measure the effect of a single dose of standardized SHR-5 Rhodiola rosea extract on capacity for mental work against a
This paper will provide the theoretical basis for its clinical application, and provide the evidences or guidance for future studies and medicinal exploitations of Rhodiola rosea L.
This review article summarizes the bioactivities, including adaptogenic, antifatigue, antidepressant, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antinoception, and anticancer activities, and the modulation of immune function of Rhodiola plants and its two constituents, a